Month: March 2007

One of the initiatives started by Superintendent Norris three years ago was the NeXt Generation Teaching program.

The idea is to identify those competencies, tools and tactics essential for effective teaching of and in the next generation.

The program was piloted with a small group of high school teachers just a bit over two years ago. Among other things those of us in the pilot attended three weeks of additional summer training and logged up to 90 hours of additional training and implimentation time throughout each of the last two school years.

The idea, sort of, was that this initial group would be “NeXt Generation Certified” by the end of the training. The difficulty was that the certification process had not really been dealt with. It was a bit of a “we’ll get to that when it comes up.”

Well, it’s come up, and 40 teachers want to know the next steps.

While the program has had it’s stumbles, no part of NGT training has failed to be thought-provoking and enriching. I’m a better teacher for taking part in the program and could walk away happy at this moment. That would, of course, go against the goal of having every teacher in the county working toward NGT certification – a certification that, heretofore, does not exist.

As is the way in education and old-school corporate America, a committee has been formed. Luckily, it’s a committee of people who can work well together and can challenge resepectfully.

After our first meeting we’d actually made progress. It’s sometimes a shocking thing to see beaurocracy moving forward.

The process isn’t complete, but it’s given me cause to create my first wiki. The committee members are all aware of the document and will hopefully tweak and tune it so that we can iron out details at our next meeting. Thus far, I’m the only one to have made any changes, but I’m hoping the others will hop online in the next few days.

More later.

technorati tags:NGT, teaching, education, professionaldevelopment, wiki, Nextgen

Boy, have I been reading lately. There’s so much going on out there that I can’t seem to focus any kind of critical thinking for too long. I suppose this is an attempt to get some focused thought out on what’s been bumping around my brain for the past few weeks.

First, Miguel Guhlin posted an interesting thought on the job of education and the type of product we tend to manufacture. I use those words because it seems as though that is the way the thinking is turning. Many posts I’ve read as of late are concerned with the outputs of education – as we all should be.
Before getting to Guhlin, David Warlick commented briefly on NCLB, and had this to say:

…I believe that No Child Left Behind has done far more harm to education in the U.S. than good. It is an industrial age solution to an information age problem. But NCLB is correct in that schools, teachers, and students must be accountable to their communities.

Warlick’s is a thought I’m running into more and more frequently. It fits nicely with Guhlin’s post:

To teach real life problem-solving in schools would result in children becoming aware that their work in school lacks authenticity, only brainwashes them to trust authority without question, make them dependent on consolidated, controlled media sources that filter the news, even censor it if you believe some alternative sources to protect the ruling elite, and serve as the lower caste of people who must do the menial jobs. The creative class of people–those who populate our private and charter schools–also are indoctrinated in specific dogmas and ideologies, allowed freedom on a rope only after, like baby elephants whipped since childhood, restricted by a heavy chain, achieve freedom of movement, but not of mind.

Decidedly, Phoenix is part of the former system. This is not say I haven’t any experience in the latter. Being able to recognize both models and identify their products leads to a better understanding of the problem. It is a problem.
The roots of many of my students’ problems with education can be found not in inability to do work but in unwillingness to play the game.
I was luck when growing up to have teachers in a small rural school who could press against the rules in order to find ways to educate that met students’ wants, needs and (I hesitate to suggest a link between education and this last one) passions. My English teachers knew what they were talking about and made their classes maleable for those of us who had an interest in words and their role in shaping society.
Equally available to me, but something I chose not to avail myself of was a top-notch agri-science program. I could be certain that the students in my English class who did not find the same artful beauty in the words we read would be enriched by…whatever it was that happened in the ag classes. Because each of us had a place where we could do the learning that interested us most, we were more willing to do the learning that interested us least.
Without any outlet, I would be extremely weary of letting anything in. My students have, by and large, lacked an outlet.
While my class may not be the outlet of choice, I’m working to do all I can to help them align themselves with whatever they need to unstop their creative impulses.
This isn’t an argument of tools; it is an argument of ideas. I don’t think a blog, wiki, podcast or laptop is required for a student to find the best opportunity for developing passion. It is about ideas. I remember when those were things we were encouraged to have and investigate.
More later.

After what I imagine to be one of the longest brainstorming session ever (he created the thing last Fall) Principal Cantees has made his first blog post. I even got a shout out. I’ve been on him for the last few weeks to post again and comment on the blogs of others. His worry is that he doesn’t have anything to say, that he wants what he writes to be important.
Ironically, it’s one of the problems I’ve seen over and over again with my beginning writers. They’re so worried that their first drafts won’t be Pulitzer-worthy that they never get anything on the page or screen.
Luckily, I think Principal Cantees is starting to come around to the idea that it’s about the conversation that comes after the posting – the one that refines your thinking and makes you do more of it – that counts more than the original post.
I suppose we’ll have to wait and see if post #2 is still months in the making.
More later.